Judge U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, Texas has ordered the FDA to produce its “emergency use authorization” (“EUA”) file to a group of scientists who want to see the information that the FDA relied on when they approved the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine.
This is hugely important to the cases filed or soon to be filed in the Courts of America, complaining about the lack of proper protection and safety measures taken by the FDA before millions of people were forced into taking the vaccine or losing their lives and careers.
We do not know how long this search for more information will go on. But it will change everything.
Dec 6 (Reuters) – A federal judge has ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to publicly disclose more information underpinning its authorization of COVID-19 vaccines, after failing to persuade the court to end the public records lawsuit.
In a ruling, opens new tab on Friday, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, Texas, ordered the agency to produce its “emergency use authorization” file to a group of scientists who wanted to see licensing information that the FDA relied on to approve the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine.
“The COVID-19 pandemic is long passed and so has any legitimate reason for concealing from the American people the information relied upon by the government in approving the Pfizer vaccine,” wrote Pittman, appointed in 2019 by then-President Donald Trump.
Attorney Aaron Siri, representing the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, welcomed Pittman’s order.
“The FDA clearly lacks confidence in the review that it conducted to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine because it is doing everything possible to prevent independent scientists from conducting an independent review,” Siri said.
He said the agency was “hiding from the court and the plaintiff one million pages of clinical trial documents from the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.”
The FDA has power to grant “emergency use authorization” for vaccines and some other medical products.
The lawsuit said, “the medical and scientific community and the public have a substantial interest in reviewing the data and information underlying the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer vaccine.”
The agency has countered that its “emergency use authorization” file did not fall within the scientist group’s records request.
The FDA said in a filing that it has produced more than 1 million pages of records in the lawsuit. The filing also said that it had set up “unprecedented and extraordinary operations” — spending more than $3.5 million — to comply with Pittman’s directives to speed up the search and delivery of responsive records.
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, whose members include professors and scientists from Yale, Harvard, UCLA and Brown, has posted thousands of records on its website.
The case is Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 4:21-cv-01058-P.
For plaintiff: Aaron Siri and Elizabeth Brehm of Siri & Glimstad
For defendant: Andrew Freidah of the U.S. Justice Department
New York State Education Law Subpart 82-3 gives the expected procedures for any Respondent charged with 3020-a. Any deviation from the law must have a written, freely and willingly given waiver. In New York City, […]
In the timeless article published in the New York Times on August 31, 1997, below, Rudy Crew tries to make the New York City Board of Education “good for every child…….The New York City schools enroll […]
Forcing young minds to think in a radical manner that is politically divisive is wrong. Young minds need self-empowerment goals and techniques. We must teach how to think, not what to think or believe. This […]
